Re: 512k upgrade
Posted: February 22nd, 1985, 2:27 am
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!info-mac
From: info-mac@uw-beaver
Newsgroups: fa.info-mac
Subject: Re: 512k upgrade
Message-ID:
Date: Thu, 31-Jan-85 20:08:02 EST
Article-I.D.: uw-beave.684
Posted: Thu Jan 31 20:08:02 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Feb-85 11:14:01 EST
Sender: daemon@uw-beaver
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 7
From: nate@cadmus (Nate Goldschag)
Faster memory chips are always OK, assuming they are not weird chips.
I upgraded mine with 150ns chips. I would advise reading a file I
put on CompuServe in DL3 of MAUG titled FATMAC.HEX before doing it
the Dr. Dobbs way - also DDWARN.TXT in the same place.
Nate Goldshlag
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!info-mac
From: info-mac@uw-beaver
Newsgroups: fa.info-mac
Subject: Re: 512k upgrade
Message-ID:
Date: Thu, 31-Jan-85 20:08:02 EST
Article-I.D.: uw-beave.684
Posted: Thu Jan 31 20:08:02 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Feb-85 11:14:01 EST
Sender: daemon@uw-beaver
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 7
From: nate@cadmus (Nate Goldschag)
Faster memory chips are always OK, assuming they are not weird chips.
I upgraded mine with 150ns chips. I would advise reading a file I
put on CompuServe in DL3 of MAUG titled FATMAC.HEX before doing it
the Dr. Dobbs way - also DDWARN.TXT in the same place.
Nate Goldshlag