Apple on Arpanet?
Posted: January 11th, 1985, 12:43 am
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!mhuxn!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!info-mac
From: info-mac@uw-beaver
Newsgroups: fa.info-mac
Subject: Apple on Arpanet?
Message-ID:
Date: Fri, 7-Dec-84 02:56:47 EST
Article-I.D.: uw-beave.113
Posted: Fri Dec 7 02:56:47 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Dec-84 04:38:04 EST
Sender: daemon@uw-beaver
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 8
From: Christopher A Kent
I was surprised to see that, too -- but it seems to be an artifact of
a bad header munger somewhere. They're on CSNET, it would seem; so
[email protected] or xxx%[email protected] is more appropriate.
chris
----------
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!mhuxn!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!info-mac
From: info-mac@uw-beaver
Newsgroups: fa.info-mac
Subject: Apple on Arpanet?
Message-ID:
Date: Fri, 7-Dec-84 02:56:47 EST
Article-I.D.: uw-beave.113
Posted: Fri Dec 7 02:56:47 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Dec-84 04:38:04 EST
Sender: daemon@uw-beaver
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 8
From: Christopher A Kent
I was surprised to see that, too -- but it seems to be an artifact of
a bad header munger somewhere. They're on CSNET, it would seem; so
[email protected] or xxx%[email protected] is more appropriate.
chris
----------