sumacc bug reports to croft@sumex
Posted: August 28th, 1984, 5:47 am
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 UW 5/3/83; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!info-mac
From: info-mac@uw-beaver (info-mac)
Newsgroups: fa.info-mac
Subject: sumacc bug reports to croft@sumex
Message-ID:
Date: Wed, 18-Jul-84 17:22:20 EDT
Article-I.D.: uw-beaver>.1248
Posted: Wed Jul 18 17:22:20 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Jul-84 04:50:44 EDT
Sender: daemon@uw-beave
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 17
From: Bill Croft
Please send any sumacc bugs to "croft@sumex", so I have a chance to
verify and produce a fix. Thanks.
From croft Tue Jul 17 13:18:06 1984
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 84 13:18:00 pdt
From: Bill Croft
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Bug (typo) in SUMacC library routine
Cc: croft, pattermann
Status: RO
Mark, your typo must have been generated locally (or during an FTP or
copy), because that typo is not present in the original distribution.
You said that the 'f' had been turned to a 'v'; if you look in
an ascii table, you will see that these are one bit off.
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 UW 5/3/83; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!info-mac
From: info-mac@uw-beaver (info-mac)
Newsgroups: fa.info-mac
Subject: sumacc bug reports to croft@sumex
Message-ID:
Date: Wed, 18-Jul-84 17:22:20 EDT
Article-I.D.: uw-beaver>.1248
Posted: Wed Jul 18 17:22:20 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Jul-84 04:50:44 EDT
Sender: daemon@uw-beave
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 17
From: Bill Croft
Please send any sumacc bugs to "croft@sumex", so I have a chance to
verify and produce a fix. Thanks.
From croft Tue Jul 17 13:18:06 1984
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 84 13:18:00 pdt
From: Bill Croft
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Bug (typo) in SUMacC library routine
Cc: croft, pattermann
Status: RO
Mark, your typo must have been generated locally (or during an FTP or
copy), because that typo is not present in the original distribution.
You said that the 'f' had been turned to a 'v'; if you look in
an ascii table, you will see that these are one bit off.