Megamax C compiler

Info-Mac discussion from 1984 - 2002.
Locked
User avatar
Info-Mac
Administrator
Posts:13716
Joined:December 21st, 1988, 11:00 am
Megamax C compiler

Post by Info-Mac » February 22nd, 1985, 3:50 am

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site uw-beaver
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!mhuxv!mhuxh!mhuxi!mhuxm!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!info-mac
From: info-mac@uw-beaver
Newsgroups: fa.info-mac
Subject: Megamax C compiler
Message-ID:
Date: Sun, 3-Feb-85 21:17:53 EST
Article-I.D.: uw-beave.727
Posted: Sun Feb 3 21:17:53 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 6-Feb-85 02:35:38 EST
Sender: daemon@uw-beaver
Organization: U of Washington Computer Science
Lines: 14

From: (Mike O'Dell[x-csam]) mo@lbl-csam

THere is one serious Gotcha in the Megamax documentation I looked at
for the much rumored V2. A "short" is a 1-byte integer!! This is
at lease strange, because char's are naturally signed on the 68K,
so why they would screw short's is beyond me. While this interpretation
is within the province of the White Book, one would think intellegent
people would try to make their compiler work in ways similar to all
the other C compilers which have come before it. But after having
seen several Mac C compilers (no to mention 8086 compilers), I am
conviced most of the people doing them don't have the slightest idea
as to how their software should work.

-Mike O'Dell
Locked